Let me say this, so you people only care about the baby itself than the womans rights? Well, if that woman get's raped or is having a miscarriage anyway. That actually sounds a shit load selfish that I've ever heard...
Though I do definitely understand the pro-life position, I personally think the problem lies on the REASONS for abortion, not abortion itself. Like war, there are times abortion is necessary, but many people have done so for extremely petty, selfish reasons.
Rape case (unless the raped victim wants to raise and keep it nonetheless - even though I still think she should get an abortion to spare the child all the misery and shame he or she is going to get, I respect the woman's choice), woman's health or life being at serious risk, etc.
Those are extreme circumstances that makes abortion absolutely nevessary. It is just as necessary as dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end the war quickly and avoid the planned invasion that would have killed more and more civilian lives - Japan would have been nothing but a barren wasteland had it gone the other way.
I disagree with you there is never a reason to kill a innocent child, even in the circumstance of rape. Also just because she has the child does not mean she has to keep and raise it now a days. Unless shes like the only human being on earth capable. which something like that I find highly unlikely.
As for the dropping of a atomic bomb, that does not justify that actively nether, in instances were people are dieing at rapid rates I find a scarce population to be more frightening then a over populated one, and having to go though the mayhem of life is just something we must do, but you can never say that if that event had not ever happen. I would be the strong, and wise person I am to day. To teach the next generation to come.